REGISTER now: Visser ai webinar - Beyond the ai hype: ai in patent prosecution
​

Early statistics regarding interest in unitary patent protection

No items found.
​
August 4, 2023
Additional information
Chevron icon
Info
Tags
UPC
Table of contents
Chevron icon
Table of contents
  • Toc Heading
  • Toc Heading

The EPO has recently added ‘Requests for unitary effect' to its Statistics & Trends Centre. The Statistics & Trends Centre provides a dashboard that now gives information about requests for unitary effect, including the associated areas of technology, language of proceedings, translation language, and origin of the (first named) proprietor of the patents.

English is a popular language of proceedings at the EPO (around 70% of unitary patents derive from European patents granted in English), and proprietors are commonly choosing to translate into Spanish or German, having the choice to file a translation into any EU official language. For patent applications where the procedural language was not English (around 30% of unitary patents), filing an English translation is the only option available.

In terms of country of origin, the statistics can be normalised to reflect the different numbers of patent applications filed by proprietors from different countries. Comparing the ‘Origin of proprietors' statistics from the dashboard with the number of granted patents by country in 2022 (2023 statistics are not available at the time of writing), it seems that the unitary patent is relatively more popular with European applicants. Given the limited time since the launch of the unitary patent system, the data is likely to be a bit noisy at this stage and may not be representative of the ultimate distribution. However, as things stand, UK, German, French, Italian and Dutch applicants are requesting unitary patents at roughly twice the rate of US, Japanese, Korean and Chinese applicants.

One can only speculate on the reasons for this – perhaps European companies and attorneys are responding more quickly to the change in the local legal landscape because it feels more relevant to them. These statistics may change with time as the largest patent applicants adapt and respond to behaviour of competitors.

The Statistics and Trends centre can be found here.

Recent Case Reports

See all Case Reports

Bringing enforcement proceedings while an appeal is still pending risks liability for defendant’s costs
24 September 2026
The Court of Appeal held that setting aside a first-instance decision granting relief subject to recurring penalties generally has retroactive effect. Any penalty fees already paid will be refunded by the Court. The value of proceedings is determined by the interest of the party that brought the action. This is not changed as a result of an appeal. A claimant bringing enforcement proceedings while an appeal is still pending does so at its own risk and may be liable for the defendant’s costs related to the enforcement proceedings.‍
​
Replacement parts and the value of asserting a narrower claim combination
17 July 2026
The UPC's Düsseldorf Local Division found that Wessper's cartridges indirectly infringed Brita's patent, and that a narrower claim combination can turn a consumable into an essential element.
​
Preliminary objection on jurisdiction partially successful – UPC clarifies requirements of anchor-defendant jurisdiction for non-UPC territories
25 June 2026
The Hamburg Local Division let Nixu pursue US-based Infoblox in the UPC for Germany, France and Finland, but threw out the UK claim. To reach a non-UPC territory through an anchor defendant, a claimant must plead joint infringement there.
​