EIP Trademark team recognised by WTR 1000 2021

No items found.
​
February 16, 2021

EIP has been highlighted as one of the world’s leading trademark specialists in the 2021 edition of WTR 1000.

Researchers for WTR 1000, published annually by World Trademark Review, references EIP’s international offices which puts it at a distinct advantage on cross-border trademark protection and litigation assignments. The team is noted for its clear communication and knowledge sharing between its various offices ensure a seamless service without limits.

Head of Brands Claire Lehr is noted as providing “critical information along with long-range strategic guidance regarding the protection of existing brand assets and the development of new ones”.

WTR 1000 notes that Claire and fellow partner Paula Flutter form a great team, with valuable contributions from seasoned associate Nora Fowler.

Recent Case Reports

Bringing enforcement proceedings while an appeal is still pending risks liability for defendant’s costs
24 September 2026
The Court of Appeal held that setting aside a first-instance decision granting relief subject to recurring penalties generally has retroactive effect. Any penalty fees already paid will be refunded by the Court. The value of proceedings is determined by the interest of the party that brought the action. This is not changed as a result of an appeal. A claimant bringing enforcement proceedings while an appeal is still pending does so at its own risk and may be liable for the defendant’s costs related to the enforcement proceedings.‍
Replacement parts and the value of asserting a narrower claim combination
17 July 2026
The UPC's Düsseldorf Local Division found that Wessper's cartridges indirectly infringed Brita's patent, and that a narrower claim combination can turn a consumable into an essential element.
Preliminary objection on jurisdiction partially successful – UPC clarifies requirements of anchor-defendant jurisdiction for non-UPC territories
25 June 2026
The Hamburg Local Division let Nixu pursue US-based Infoblox in the UPC for Germany, France and Finland, but threw out the UK claim. To reach a non-UPC territory through an anchor defendant, a claimant must plead joint infringement there.