REGISTER now: Visser ai webinar - BEYOND THE HYPE: AI IN PATENT PROSECUTION
​

UK Government confirms Patent Box scheme

No items found.
​
March 27, 2012
Additional information
Chevron icon
Table of contents
Chevron icon
Table of contents
  • Toc Heading
  • Toc Heading

Chancellor George Osborne confirmed in his 2012 Budget that the proposed Patent Box scheme will go ahead.

When fully phased in, the rate of Corporation Tax on profits attributed to patents will be 10%. This is coupled with a reduction in the basic rate of Corporation Tax from its current level of 26% to 24% from April 2012 and to 22% from April 2013.

The Patent Box is intended to encourage companies to base their R&D and manufacturing operations within the UK by making the country more competitive with other European countries.

The confirmation of the Patent Box was a contributing factor in GSK announcing on 22 March that it would be investing £500m across its UK manufacturing sites to increase production of key active ingredients for its pharmaceutical products and vaccines. This will result in the creation of up to 1,000 new jobs and include the location of a new manufacturing facility at Ulverston in Cumbria.

GSK’s CEO Sir Andrew Witty said: “The introduction of the Patent Box has transformed the way in which we view the UK as a location for new investments, ensuring that the medicines of the future will not only be discovered, but can also continue to be made here in Britain.”

EIP can advise on the IP strategy considerations for gaining the most benefit from the Patent Box. Click here to read our guidance note or contact our IP strategists.

Recent Case Reports

See all Case Reports

Bringing enforcement proceedings while an appeal is still pending risks liability for defendant’s costs
24 September 2026
The Court of Appeal held that setting aside a first-instance decision granting relief subject to recurring penalties generally has retroactive effect. Any penalty fees already paid will be refunded by the Court. The value of proceedings is determined by the interest of the party that brought the action. This is not changed as a result of an appeal. A claimant bringing enforcement proceedings while an appeal is still pending does so at its own risk and may be liable for the defendant’s costs related to the enforcement proceedings.‍
​
Replacement parts and the value of asserting a narrower claim combination
17 July 2026
The UPC's Düsseldorf Local Division found that Wessper's cartridges indirectly infringed Brita's patent, and that a narrower claim combination can turn a consumable into an essential element.
​
Preliminary objection on jurisdiction partially successful – UPC clarifies requirements of anchor-defendant jurisdiction for non-UPC territories
25 June 2026
The Hamburg Local Division let Nixu pursue US-based Infoblox in the UPC for Germany, France and Finland, but threw out the UK claim. To reach a non-UPC territory through an anchor defendant, a claimant must plead joint infringement there.
​