REGISTER now: Sweden Event - A new era for innovation: AI, the UPC and global patent opportunities
​

€325 million Funding for Semiconductor Research and Innovation in the UK and the EU

​
Tom Swift
​
Andrew Thompson
​
July 9, 2024
Info
Tags
Ampliphy
Digital
Patenting
Table of contents
  • Toc Heading
  • Toc Heading

Europe's Chips Joint Undertaking has bolstered its support for the semiconductor industry by announcing three funding calls with a combined value of up to €325M. The funding calls are to create: a pilot line for photonic integrated circuits (PICs), semiconductor chip competency centres, and a cloud-based design platform. As the UK is part of the Chips Joint Undertaking, the funding is available to both EU and UK companies.

This first funding call is up to €180M for pilot lines for the development, testing, and small-scale production of PICs. This aims to facilitate companies making the treacherous leap "from lab to fab". The up to €120M of funding for chip competency centres aims to provide access to expertise and facilities for experiments. These services are primarily for start-ups and SMEs and will reduce the barrier-to-entry for small companies. Further, the centres will augment the development and design capabilities of existing companies. The design platform funding is up to €25M to create a cloud-based platform for semiconductor chip design. To enhance collaboration and support smaller companies without the capacity to develop their own in-house platform, the design platform will be open access.

This funding will reenforce Europe's strong community of PIC companies and provide opportunities to produce valuable IP. Much of the innovation and creation will be collaborative and state-sponsored. Whilst this can dramatically increase the output of these projects, it also places rights-holders in a minefield of joint development agreements, joint ownership, and licensing agreements. The EU often directs companies to co-ownership of IP. Whilst this can initially provide a simple solution, co-ownership often proves problematic later. For example, when an owner wants to sell or licence their IP, deals can be hamstrung by co-owners. It will be important for companies to carefully consider IP before undertaking such projects. Having an effective IP strategy and IP agreements in place before collaboration and innovation starts will prove vital in the long-term success of such projects - even when dealing with open access or open-source platforms.

Companies can apply for funding through the Chips Joint Undertaking's website. The deadline to apply for funding for the PIC pilot line, the competence centres, and the design platform are 5pm CEST on 17 September 2024, 2 October 2024, and 10 October 2024 respectively.

This funding is part of the Chips for Europe initiative under the Chips Act see Andrew Thompson's article on the EU Chips Act here.

Recent Case Reports

See all Case Reports

Court of Appeal affirms interpretation of product-by-process features in claims, and clarifies applicable law pre-June 2023
29 September 2026
The Court of Appeal confirmed that product-by-process features in a product claim limit the claim only where the specified process imparts characteristics that can be achieved solely by that process. It also clarified the law applicable to acts occurring before 1 June 2023, holding that UPC law may apply to ongoing infringement for injunctive relief, whereas damages for acts completed before that date are governed by national law, and that claims for provisional protection remain governed by national law.
​
Appeal reveals tricky deadlines for orders contained in decisions
29 September 2026
The Court of Appeal held that where a “privileged order” under Rule 220(1)(c), such as an order relating to the production of evidence under Article 59 UPCA and Rule 190 RoP, is contained within a decision on the merits, a 15 day appeal deadline for that order applies, separate from the substantive appeal deadline. Appeals challenging such orders after that deadline are inadmissible, and parties cannot circumvent the appeal rules by re-filing substantially the same request in the appeal proceedings.
​
Bringing enforcement proceedings while an appeal is still pending risks liability for defendant’s costs
24 September 2026
The Court of Appeal held that setting aside a first-instance decision granting relief subject to recurring penalties generally has retroactive effect. Any penalty fees already paid will be refunded by the Court. The value of proceedings is determined by the interest of the party that brought the action. This is not changed as a result of an appeal. A claimant bringing enforcement proceedings while an appeal is still pending does so at its own risk and may be liable for the defendant’s costs related to the enforcement proceedings.‍
​