UKIPO report of IP trends for UK Higher Education Institutions highlights life sciences innovation

No items found.
​
April 30, 2020

On 29 April 2020, the UKIPO published an overview report of IP trends for UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) and their spin-out businesses, between 1999 and 2018. We focus on some of the main takeaways and trends from this overview for the life sciences sector below.

The report highlights the value that UK universities place on life sciences innovation, as reflected by the impressive percentage of patent publications in the fields of Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals. Indeed, 47 % of UK HEI patent publications are in the Chemistry sector (over 50% of which used pharmaceuticals and biotechnology IPC technology fields), compared to 21% of all patent publications globally.

Notably, there was a rise in the level of international collaboration between UK HEIs and entities abroad, particularly in the US. This trend demonstrates both the aim of universities to more effectively exploit their IP commercially and the importance of collaboration for the transfer of technology.

Life sciences powerhouses Imperial College London, UCL and Oxford University were among those institutions showing not only the largest output of published applications, but also the greatest proportional increase in activity. Furthermore, of the top 10 spin-out businesses, according to the number of applications, six of these have a biotechnological focus, including DNA sequencing products, biotherapeutics and drug discovery.

The importance of innovation within the life sciences sector to UK universities, and the UK as a whole, is clear from this report. As we move into the era of personalised medicine and with Artificial Intelligence and machine learning becoming increasingly significant in healthcare innovation, it will be interesting to see whether UK HEIs continue to lead in this new era and whether more and more computer technology related patent filings over the next 20 years will be important to the healthcare sector.

Recent Case Reports

No language change at Central Division
08 October 2026
Proceedings before the UPC Central Division must be conducted in the language in which the patent was granted. There is no legal basis to change that language. In a revocation action concerning a German-language patent, the Paris Central Division rejected a request to switch the language of proceedings to English, and also rejected a subsidiary request to allow written submissions in English and hold the hearing in English, holding that Article 49(6) UPCA permits no derogation and reflects a deliberate legislative choice.
Criteria for obtaining an order to produce evidence under Rule 190
07 October 2026
This appeal judgment clarifies that Rule 190 orders to produce evidence require three cumulative conditions: specificity, necessity and proportionality, and cannot be used for fishing expeditions. The Court of Appeal confirmed that first instance judges enjoy a broad margin of discretion when assessing such requests, and upheld the order requiring production of two fabric samples for ballistic testing. Both the appeal and the cross-appeal were dismissed.
Court of Appeal focuses on the technical effect to determine added matter
30 September 2026
The Court of Appeal provided guidance on their approach to assessing added subject matter, highlighting that the technical effect underlying the invention and how the claimed and unclaimed features contribute thereto is central to the analysis.