British Medical Journal: Pregabalin patent litigation and its implications

No items found.
​
08 June 2018
Tags
Litigation
Life

The British Medical Journal has published two papers co-authored by Darren Smyth on the wide-ranging implications of the patent litigation related to the drug pregabalin.

The first paper explains the arguments over the patent case and its impact for the NHS. In particular, the paper analyses the conflict between generic prescribing as a near-universal practice in the UK, and the policing of second medical use patents. Darren’s co-authors were Ben Goldacre and Richard Croker of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford University, where Darren is an honorary research fellow.

The second paper focuses on the impact on the prescribing patterns of clinicians before, during, and after the litigation and expiry of the patent, as well as the financial cost to the NHS, and is additionally co-authored by Alex Walker of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine.

Related articles

EIP ranked Band 1 in Chambers UK 2027, with three lawyers also recognised
14 October 2026
Chambers recognised EIP for its patent litigation work and its strength in disputes concerning FRAND licensing and standard essential patents.
EIP named a leading patent firm again in the Legal 500 UK 2027
01 October 2026
EIP has retained its Tier 1 ranking in PATMA: Patents and its Tier 2 ranking in IP: Patents (contentious and non-contentious) in the Legal 500 UK 2027 guide. In addition, Gary Moss was inducted into the Hall of Fame in IP: Patents.
Five EIP partners named among the world's leading IP strategists in the 2026 IAM Strategy 300
17 August 2026
Christof Höhne, Darren Smyth, Heather McCann, James Seymour, and Sebastian Fuchs have all been named in this year's list, each recognised for their own approach to building patent value for clients.