Case Reports
UPC Case Reports
Geographic Scope of the UPC and Unitary Patent
22 February 2023
The grant of a European Patent allows patent rights to be obtained in respect of over 35 states by means of the respective validation procedures for those states.
#
UPC
#
Basic
The Unified Patent Court (UPC) will begin operations in Europe on 1 June
20 February 2023
Following news of Germany's depositing its instrument of ratification of the UPC agreement on 17 February, mark your calendars for 1 June when the Unified Patent Court (UPC) will begin operations in...
#
UPC
Information from the UPC Registry
01 December 2022
The Registry of the Unified Patent Court maintains a number of Registers which are publicly accessible via their website at www.unified-patent-court.org.
#
UPC
#
Basic
Member States participating in UPC
23 August 2022
Member States of the EU that have already ratified the UPC Agreement (or in the case of Germany has indicated it will do so) and so will take part in the UPC as soon as it commences are:Austria,...
#
UPC
What is the Unitary Patent, and how do I get one?
09 June 2022
The Unitary Patent will be a single patent right, obtained via the European Patent Office, covering all EU Member States which have ratified the agreement at the patent grant date.
#
UPC
Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court - finally happening?
24 September 2021
The project to establish a Unitary Patent in Europe and a Unified Patent Court to handle patent infringement litigation for European patents is underway again.
#
UPC
Other Case Reports
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Court of Appeal puts an end to lawyers creating confusion
29 November 2012
In Marks and Spencer Plc v Interflora Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501, the Court of Appeal has effectively killed off what was a common place practice of adducing favourable evidence of confusion (or lack...
#
Litigation
Needles in the UK Patents County Court
26 September 2012
Liversidge v (1) Owen Mumford Limited (2) Abbott Laboratories LimitedIn April 2011, the claimant commenced patent infringement proceedings in the UK Patents County Court (“PCC”) against the...
#
Litigation
#
Life
High Court confirms that it is not fine for Spicerhaart to continue using “FINE”
25 September 2012
A recent decision of the High Court has brought to a conclusion a dispute between Fine & Country Limited (F&C) and Okotoks Limited (formerly Spicerhaart Limited and part of the Spicerhaart Group of...
#
Litigation
Antibody claims held sufficient, but how valuable will they be?
19 September 2012
In the latest Eli Lilly v HGS ruling, the Court of Appeal has found HGS antibody claims to be sufficient, given the Supreme Court has already held the claims to be capable of industrial applicability.
#
Litigation
#
Life
SPCs for Antibodies: A CJEU reference probably but not immediately
17 September 2012
The Patents Court has issued another judgment expressing dissatisfaction with the CJEU’s ruling in Medeva (C-322/10). In particular, the Court has held that in order to determine if a particular...
#
Litigation
#
Life
No way Round BMW’s rights – upgrade is not repair
11 September 2012
A High Court decision last month has provided guidance on how Article 110(1) of the Community Designs Regulation 6/2002/EC, which relates to the protection of designs for component parts of complex...
#
Litigation
Confusion in the marketplace: “Woolley” licences and misrepresentation
28 August 2012
Woolley v Ultimate Products Ltd[2012] EWCA Civ 1038 (26 July 2012)Upholding a decision of the High Court, the Court of Appeal considered the effect of a licence, consumer confusion “the wrong way”...
#
Litigation
Three new UK IPO decisions demonstrate the wide commercial applicability of registered designs
24 August 2012
In the UK, applications to declare a UK registered design invalid can be filed at the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), whereupon the case is decided by a Hearing Officer of the UKIPO acting...
#
Building a Resilient Quantum Patent Portfolio: Winning the Race to File First
Design right re-design – an opportunity for UK business to shape design protection to suit its needs
22 August 2012
The UK Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO) has recently published a consultation document on the proposed reform of the UK Designs Legal Framework.
#
Litigation
Gimex v Chill Bag: does the indication of the product in a registered design affect validity and infringement?
20 August 2012
A Patents County Court judgment by HHJ Birss QC in Gimex v Chill Bag provides guidance on whether the indication of the product in a registered design has any bearing when assessing validity and...
#
Litigation
Adducing evidence of confusion in trademark actions – a further move towards tighter control of witness gathering exercises?
09 August 2012
Interflora Inc & Anor v Marks and Spencer Plc & Anor [2012] EWHC 1722 (Ch)In a wider action concerning the alleged infringement of two of Interflora’s trademarks through Marks & Spencer’s use of...
No items found.
Exceptions to the privilege of self-incrimination
07 August 2012
On 4 July in Phillips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom gave judgment on two key issues regarding the privilege against self-incrimination.
#
Litigation
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser -Busch Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 880 (03 July 2012)
01 August 2012
The Court of Appeal recently allowed an appeal by Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik (BB), against a decision that found its “Budweiser” mark invalid following an attack by Anheuser-Busch (AB) which...
#
Litigation
Patentability of computer programs - High Court judgment gives rise to useful examples of a “technical effect”
31 July 2012
(HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1789).A further decision in the so-called “smartphone wars” was issued by the High Court recently in relation to a patent dispute between HTC Europe Co Ltd...
#
Litigation
#
Digital
IPKat: Further analysis of Generics (t/a Mylan) v Yeda and Teva
18 July 2012
In addition to an earlier summary by Darren Smyth of the ruling in Generics (t/a Mylan) v Yeda and Teva, Darren has provided further analysis for the IPKat.
#
Litigation
#
Life
Stay in the Know
The UPC Newsletter
Get expert insights and the top patent stories delivered straight to your inbox.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please try again.