What is the Unitary Patent and how do I get one?

No items found.
​
November 1, 2022

The Unitary Patent (UP) is a single patent right, obtained via the European Patent Office, covering all EU Member States which have ratified the agreement at the patent grant date, and is subject to the UPC (opt_out is not possible).

Even if other countries join the system after the grant of the patent, they will not be added to the UP.

It is also referred to as a "European patent having unitary effect".

How do I obtain a Unitary Patent?

The request to convert the European patent into a UP, instead of a bundle of national rights in the participating countries, is made by the proprietor to the European Patent Office (EPO) on grant of the patent.

Your EIP contact can assist with this.

Does this replace the validation procedures?

The existing validation procedures continue to be available in order to obtain protection in those countries which have not ratified the agreement at the grant date (including those which may later ratify the agreement), i.e. those which would not be covered by a UP.

Additionally, because the Unitary Patent is not compulsory, the existing validation procedures continue to be available in order to obtain individual patents with national effect even for Member States which participate in the Unitary Patent system.

Why should I obtain a Unitary Patent?

The UP offers protection in many countries for a lower total cost than if the current bundle system is used to obtain protection in the same set of countries. Further, a single enforcement action, effective in many countries, means that litigation is likely to be cheaper too.

What else is important about Unitary Patents?

A UP is a single indivisible patent, rather than a bundle of national patents. It is only available if the granted European patent has the same claims for all participating Member States (which here means all EU states that participated in the Unitary Patent project from the outset, even those who are currently outside the system because they have not yet ratified the UPC agreement) and must be valid in all the states that it covers (i.e. those that have ratified the UPC agreement as of the grant date of the European patent). This could mean that prior art that is only relevant in one state may invalidate a UP.

The UP is vulnerable to a single revocation action across member states. This might be initiated by someone resident in a country where the UP has effect, who otherwise might not have taken any interest if you did not validate in that country.

A UP may only be limited, transferred or revoked, or lapse in respect of all the participating Member States that it covers. There is a single renewal fee _ it is not possible to selectively drop countries to reduce renewal fee costs. However, a UP may be licensed in respect of the whole or part of the territories of the participating Member States.

The Latest Thought Leadership pieces in the Content Hub

Information from the UPC Registry
December 1, 2022
The Registry of the Unified Patent Court maintains a number of Registers which are publicly accessible via their website at www.unified-patent-court.org.
What languages does the UPC use?
November 1, 2022
Central Division Proceedings at the central division are in the language in which the patent was granted (i.e., either French, German or English).
Geographic Scope of the UPC and Unitary Patent
February 22, 2023
The grant of a European Patent allows patent rights to be obtained in respect of over 35 states by means of the respective validation procedures for those states.
Opt-out decision
December 2, 2022
Owners of European patent rights (both pending and granted patents) need to decide, in respect of each right individually, whether to opt out of the Unified Patent Court ("UPC") system.
Stay in the Know

The Patent Strategist

Get expert insights and the top patent stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Heading
This is some text inside of a div block.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Latest Insights

Showing 0 of 100
Making the switch from in-house to private practice
28 June 2019
During his career in IP partner Matt Jones has held positions in both private practice law firms, and in-house corporate legal departments, before he joined EIP.
#
Litigation
​
Blockchain and the impact of patents
28 May 2019
In an article for Intellectual Property Magazine partner Christof Höhne and legal assistant Tatiana Dolenko look at the rise of blockchain technology and how blockchain patents, and their litigation,...
#
Litigation
​
Protecting IP rights pre- and post-Brexit
07 May 2019
With the date the UK was due to leave the European Union having passed, Partner Darren Smyth provides an update in The Law Society Gazette with regards to the continued protection of IP rights in the...
#
Patenting
​
IP Mistakes to Avoid - No. 4 - DIY
11 October 2016
In the final part of the series of Top IP Mistakes to Avoid, partner Laurence Brown from the EIP office in Leeds warns against the pitfalls of attempting to obtain IP protection yourself.
#
Patenting
​
IP Mistakes to Avoid – No. 3 – Thinking you’re covered because you’ve got the company name registered
04 October 2016
Ahead of his presentation on the Top IP Mistakes to Avoid at Leeds Business Week, partner Laurence Brown from EIP’s Leeds office dispels one of the most common myths surrounding IP protection.
#
Patenting
​
IP Mistakes to Avoid – No. 2 – Revealing your idea before getting your IP in place
30 September 2016
In the second in our series of Top IP Mistakes to Avoid, partner Laurence Brown from EIP’s office in Leeds discusses how businesses often forego their chances of obtaining patent protection by making...
#
Patenting
​
IP Mistakes to Avoid - No.1 - Burying your head in the sand
20 September 2016
In the lead up to EIP’s participation in Leeds Business Week, partner Laurence Brown of EIP’s Leeds office will be revealing his Top IP Mistakes to Avoid.
#
Patenting
​
Patent Box and R&D tax credits: Are you missing out?
15 April 2016
EIP has teamed up with Jumpstart for an evening seminar on how innovative companies can get maximum benefit from the Patent Box and R&D tax credit schemes.
#
Patenting
​
Pitfalls of translating prior art documents
28 January 2015
The Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice (JIPLP) has published an article by Darren Smyth, Robert Barker and Tim Belcher advising applicants how to handle requests for translations of...
#
Patenting
​
Getting to the EIP London Office
Use this guide to locate the EIP office in London