The evolution of nucleic acid sequencing and what it means for Genomics and IP

​
April 27, 2026

The journey from deciphering individual DNA strands to sequencing entire genomes in hours represents one of biotechnology's most impressive transformations. The first human genome, completed through the Human Genome Project, took around 13 years to sequence and cost billions of dollars, whereas modern sequencing methods can now deliver a genome in hours for a few hundred dollars. For those interested in patents and life sciences, understanding the technical evolution of sequencing methods offers insights into how fundamental scientific advances translate into valuable patent portfolios.
‍

First Generation: Sanger

Developed in 1977, Sanger sequencing established the foundation for modern DNA sequencing. The technique relies on modified nucleotides called dideoxy nucleotides (ddNTPs) that, when incorporated during DNA synthesis, terminate the growing chain due to their lack of a 3'-OH group. By creating DNA fragments of varying lengths that can be separated and analysed, the Sanger method can be used to determine DNA sequences base by base.

Despite its ground breaking nature, Sanger sequencing is labour-intensive and costly. Its maximum read length is around 1,000 base pairs and throughput is limited by its sequential nature. Nevertheless, it remained the gold standard for over two decades and powered the completion of the Human Genome Project. Its high accuracy, at approximately99.9%, still makes it useful for validating short sequences and verifying genetic variants in clinical settings today.

Second Generation: The NGS Revolution

The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the mid-2000s transformed genomics by enabling massively parallel sequencing, processing millions of DNA fragments simultaneously, rather than one at a time. This shift reduced sequencing costs by orders of magnitude and improved access to genomic analysis.

Illumina Sequencing-by-Synthesis

Illumina's platform dominates the NGS market through its sequencing-by-synthesis (SBS) approach. Genomic DNA is first fragmented, ligated to adaptors and loaded onto a flow cell, where each fragment is immobilised and clonally amplified into a cluster by bridge amplification. During sequencing, fluorescently labelled nucleotides are added sequentially in cycles. Each nucleotide incorporation produces a distinct fluorescent signal captured by optical detectors. This results in millions of short reads that are computationally aligned (e.g. to a reference genome) to reconstruct the original longer sequence.

Illumina systems deliver high accuracy, with fragment read lengths typically between 50-300 base pairs. Their scalability ranges from benchtop instruments for small laboratories to production-scale sequencers generating terabases of data per run. This combination of accuracy, throughput, and declining costs has positioned Illumina as the current market leader in this space.

Ion Torrent: Semiconductor Sequencing

Ion Torrent technology, owned by Thermo Fisher, eliminated the optical detection systems used by Illumina. Instead, it detects hydrogen ions (H+) released during nucleotide incorporation. When a nucleotide binds to a growing DNA strand, it releases a hydrogen ion, causing a pH change detected by ion-sensitive field-effect transistors (ISFETs) embedded in a semiconductor chip.

DNA fragments are clonally amplified on beads via emulsion PCR (PCR in water-in-oil droplets to compartmentalise individual templates with beads), then loaded into microwells on a semiconductor chip and exposed to sequential nucleotide flow cycles,similar to SBS. Base incorporation is detected electronically by measuring pH changes and converting these signals directly into sequence data, enabling fast runs (as short as a few hours) and lower instrument costs by avoiding complex optics. However, accuracy can suffer in homopolymer regions (stretches of identical bases), where multiple incorporations in a single cycle make ion-based quantification harder, leading to slightly higher error rates. That said, the speed and cost benefits make Ion Torrent attractive for applications such as microbial genomics.

DNBSEQ: DNA Nanoball Technology

Another short‑read platform worth a mention is the MGI (a subsidiary of the BGI Group) DNBSEQ platform, which represents a distinct second‑generation approach using DNA nanoballs (DNBs). DNA fragments are circularised, amplified by rolling‑circle amplification into compact nanoballs, and loaded onto patterned nanoarrays. Sequencing is then performed using combinatorial probe-anchor synthesis (cPAS),an SBS‑like cyclic chemistry in which fluorescently labelled nucleotides are incorporated and the array is imaged each cycle to determine the sequence.

DNBSEQ technology is reported to achieve accuracy comparable to Illumina platforms while offering a user-friendly platform with competitive pricing, which could contribute to increased adoption in China and other Asian markets.

Third generation: long-read, single molecule sequencing

While second-generation methods revolutionised throughput and cost, their short-read lengths create challenges for assembling complete genomes from fragments. Third-generation technologies address these limitations by sequencing single DNA molecules in real time,producing reads measuring thousands to even millions of bases. These approaches have also opened the door to direct RNA sequencing.

Oxford Nanopore Sequencing

Oxford Nanopore Technologies(ONT) pioneered a unique approach: passing DNA or RNA strands through protein channels (nanopores) embedded in a synthetic membrane. An electrical current flows through the pore, and as nucleotides of the strand pass through, they cause characteristic disruptions in this current. Sophisticated algorithms decode these current fluctuations into sequence information.

Nanopore sequencing runs can be analysed as data are generated and read lengths can span from short fragments to multi‑mega base lengths. Notably, the technology can also be used to call certain base modifications (including methylation) and can directly sequence RNA strands. These properties can be leveraged where rapid, on‑site sequencing is useful, such as pathogen identification or field sampling.

Recent chemistry improvements and advanced base calling algorithms have further improved accuracy, making this exciting technology increasingly competitive for diverse genomic analyses.

Pacific Biosciences SMRT Sequencing

Single Molecule Real-Time (SMRT)sequencing, developed by Pacific Biosciences (PacBio), monitors individual DNA polymerase enzymes as they synthesise DNA in real time. The technology uses zero-mode wave guides (ZMWs), which are tiny observation chambers where a single polymerase molecule is attached to a DNA template. As the polymerase incorporates fluorescently labelled nucleotides, brief fluorescent pulses are detected and decoded into sequence information.

SMRT sequencing can generate long reads, and in circular consensus sequencing (CCS) mode the same circular template is read multiple times and combined into a high‑accuracy consensus (HiFi) read. Analysis software also supports epigenetic research by measuring the rate of DNA base incorporation during sequencing. The long reads of SMRT sequencing can be useful for de novo genome assembly and for detection of structural variants and repetitive regions.

Emerging technology: the fourth generation

Roche Sequencing by Expansion(SBX)

Roche has introduced a new approach called sequencing by expansion (SBX), designed to further enhance signal‑to‑noise performance in nanopore‑based sequencing. SBX first uses a biochemical conversion step to encode the sequence of a target nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) into a longer, engineered surrogate polymer (an “Xpandomer”) built from expandable nucleotide triphosphates (X‑NTPs). The resulting expanded molecule is then read using Roche’s nanopore sensing system, with the goal of enabling faster, high‑accuracy single‑molecule sequencing across a range of read lengths. It will be interesting to see whether SBX achieves broad uptake and becomes a widely adopted platform.

Patent landscape and IP strategy

The nucleic acid sequencing field exemplifies both the value of fundamental biotech platform patents and the emerging importance of algorithmic innovations in competitive strategy.

Platform Patents Remain Crucial

Foundational patents covering sequencing chemistries, hardware architectures, and new biochemical processes continue to command significant market power and generate substantial licensing revenue or settlement payments. The July 2022 settlement between Illumina and BGI (including Complete Genomics) illustrates this, where Illumina reportedly agreed to pay $325 million to resolve patent infringement claims and terminate multiple pending lawsuits.

Despite sequencing becoming more commoditised, core platform technologies remain fiercely protected and highly valuable. The sequencing industry has a long track record of patent and competition disputes, and multiple legal proceedings between major players and newer entrants remain ongoing across jurisdictions, continuing to influence commercial strategy and market dynamics.

Algorithmic innovation

Sequencing advances increasing lyhinge on computation and machine learning, particularly for improved error correction and base/variant calling. This raises IP issues distinct from, and sometimes intersecting with, biochemical inventions. For instance, software and algorithm focussed claims can face tougher eligibility scrutiny and should be directed to concrete technical improvements (e.g., higher accuracy, lower compute, or new processing architectures), not abstract mathematics implemented on a computer.

For sequencing algorithms, companies must weigh patents against trade secrets or find ways of utilising both. Patents can block competitors but require full disclosure; where methods can be hard to reverse-engineer from outputs (as with many “black box” base callers), trade secrets may preserve advantage longer than a 20‑year patent term while avoiding disclosure that enables design‑around.

Balancing protection strategies

The most sophisticated IP strategies in sequencing combine multiple protection mechanisms, including platform patents for core hardware and chemistry, a mix of patents and trade secrets for algorithmic improvements, and copyright protection for software implementations. Companies must also consider that maintaining trade secrets requires robust confidentiality measures and does not provide any protection against independent third-party innovation, while patents demand ongoing prosecution costs and eventual public disclosure.

For both startups and established companies, navigating this complex landscape requires careful assessment of each innovation's characteristics, competitive dynamics, reverse-engineering risk, and long-term business strategy. The substantial settlements and ongoing litigation demonstrate that getting IP strategy right can determine market position and company valuation in this competitive sector.

‍

The Latest Thought Leadership pieces in the Content Hub

No items found.
Stay in the Know

The Patent Strategist

Get expert insights and the top patent stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Heading
This is some text inside of a div block.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Latest Insights

Showing 0 of 100
UPC Agreement Is Not EU Law, No Referrals to CJEU
01 September 2025
expert v. Seoul Viosys, UPC_CoA_380/2025 Order of 20 August 2025 (ORD_22147/2025)[1] This order from the UPC Court of Appeal clearly states that the Court of Justice of the EU cannot be asked to...
#
Litigation
​
Unconventional Service: igus v. Whale Technology
29 August 2025
UPC_CFI_318/2025, decision of 5 August 2025 (ORD_34299/2025)[1] In a default judgment issued by the Düsseldorf Local Division of the Unified Patent Court, Whale Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
#
Litigation
​
A Cloud of Uncertainty: Implications of G 1/23 for Software Companies
29 July 2025
On 2 July 2025, the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) issued its landmark decision in case G 1/23 (Solar Cell Sealing Materials and Solar Cell Module), a ruling that has...
#
Consulting
​
Flawed consultation on Standard Essential Patents launched by UK Government
29 July 2025
Earlier this month, the UK Government unveiled its latest consultation on Standard Essential Patents, proposing some "practical steps" which they are considering to "create a more balanced system"...
#
Litigation
​
UPC refuses extension of deadline for review of seizure order after refusal of service
22 July 2025
Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber Co., Ltd. and China Council for the Promotion of International Trade, Automotive Sub Council Order of 14 July 2025 (ORD_26742/2025 [1]) This article follows up on the UPC...
#
Litigation
​
UPC grants ‘in absentia’ permanent injunction on agricultural tool
21 July 2025
Maschio Gaspardo S.p.A. v Spiridonakis Bros GP (UPC_CFI_513/2024 relating to EP1998604) Order of 25 June 2025 (ORD_17812/2025 [1]) This Decision from the Central Division of the Unified Patent Court...
#
Litigation
​
Applying Ocado, the UPC grants a R262 request to access CFI documents
09 July 2025
NJOY Netherlands B.V v Juul Labs International, Inc (UPC_CFI_309/2023) Order issued 9 June 2025 (ORD_27305/2025) [1] The Paris Central Division revoked Juul Lab's patent EP 3 498 115 B1 by decision...
#
Litigation
​
Unified Patent Court: The Impact of Brexit
26 June 2025
The Unified Patent Court (UPC) now has jurisdiction over 18 of the 27 EU states and advertises itself as an EU court but is there any prospect of the UK getting involved in the Unified Patent Court...
#
Consulting
​
Lionra Technologies Ltd. v Cisco Systems GmbH and Cisco Systems, Inc.
25 June 2025
UPC_CFI_58/2024 Following a decision, a successful party has one month to apply for a costs decision (Rule 151). In the relevant case, the main decision (dated 19 February 2025) stated that the...
#
Litigation
​
Provisional Injunction Denied for Small Molecule Kinase Inhibitor
19 June 2025
Zentiva Portugal, LDA v. Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH (UPC_CFI_41/2025 relating to EP1830843) Court of First Instance Order dated 8 May 2025 ORD_18599/2025 [1] Summary The Application for...
#
Litigation
​
Avoiding Added Matter Pitfalls: Mastering Amendments Before the EPO
17 June 2025
"Added matter" objections are a common and often frustrating hurdle in European patent prosecution. The European Patent Office (EPO) takes a particularly strict stance on claim amendments, especially...
#
Patenting
​
The UPC two years on: Withdrawals of actions becoming prominent
09 June 2025
The Unified Patent Court has now been running for two years. To mark the occasion, we have looked at the cases and the decisions over the past two years, and share our thoughts on the current state...
#
Litigation
​
INTA 2026 Essentials: Where to stay, what to see and what to do
03 June 2025
Discover the INTA 2026 Essentials! This comprehensive guide will help you navigate your stay, showcasing the best accommodations, must-see attractions, and exciting activities to enjoy during your visit.
#
Patenting
​
Building a Resilient Quantum Patent Portfolio: Winning the Race to File First
29 May 2025
A key question for those working in a fast-paced and complex industry such as quantum technology is when to patent any technological developments.
#
Consulting
​
AI and Bitstreams at the Core of China’s Patent Update
28 May 2025
On April 30, 2025, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) released a draft amendment of the Patent Examination Guidelines (for public comment), proposing further revisions to...
#
Patenting
​