Opt-out decision

No items found.
​
December 2, 2022
  • Owners of European patent rights (both pending and granted patents) need to decide, in respect of each right individually, whether to opt out of the Unified Patent Court ("UPC") system.
  • A patent which is not opted out of the UPC system can be asserted in respect of multiple countries in a single UPC court proceeding. Equally, however, the patent can be invalidated in a single proceeding.
  • Opting out preserves the status quo of national jurisdiction, but an opted_out patent cannot take advantage of the centralised benefits of the UPC system.
  • Opting out is possible only for ‘traditional' EP patents obtained by national validation; it is not possible to opt out a Unitary Patent.

What is the opt_out?

Since the UPC opened for business on 1 June 2023, European patent rights resulting from the validation of a patent granted by the European Patent Office are, by default, subject to the authority of the UPC (in parallel with national court jurisdiction) in a large number of EU Member States.

However, a European patent right which has been opted out of the UPC will remain only under national jurisdiction, for its lifetime (see How does the opt_out work?).

Why opt out?

Using the UPC, a third party can, via a single revocation proceeding, seek to revoke the patent in all UPC Participating States in which the patent is in force. Opting out therefore prevents a third party from revoking your patent for multiple countries in a single proceeding – anyone seeking to challenge your European patent will either have to do so within 9 months of grant using the continuing European Patent Office's Opposition process or, thereafter, apply to individual national courts, as is currently the case.

Why might I not opt out?

You may decide to apply for a Unitary Patent, for example because it is more cost_effective. All Unitary Patents are automatically subject to the UPC's jurisdiction and cannot be opted out.

For other (non_Unitary) patents, the UPC will enable you to assert your patent in multiple EU Member States in a single court proceeding. This possibility is not available for an opted_out patent.

Although it is possible to opt_out patent applications once the application has been published, there is unlikely to be any benefit to making the opt_out decision prior to the time of grant, because it is not generally possible to litigate a patent before grant.

What is the latest date for opt out?

The possibility to opt_out will remain in place for at least seven years after the UPC opens. This is the so_called "Transition Period" and it may be extended. For a given patent right, an opt_out can only happen if no UPC proceeding has been started in respect of that patent right. Even if an attempt at revocation at the UPC is unsuccessful, that patent cannot then be opted out. Because a third party may initiate a revocation at the UPC at any time, we recommend that if you decide to opt out any granted patents, this should be done as soon as possible.

Can I change my mind?

An opt_out can be reversed by withdrawing the opt_out. However, this option will not be available if a patent has been litigated nationally. Also, be aware that withdrawal of opt_out can only be done once, so if you opt out a patent or application and then opt it back in, it is not possible to request a further opt_out.

Similarly, if you decide now not to opt_out, it will not be possible to apply to opt_out a patent if a UPC proceeding has been started in respect of that patent right.

You do not have to take the same approach for all of your European portfolio: you could consider a mixed approach, in which only a part of your portfolio is opted_out, and the rest are left within the remit of the UPC. Ultimately, though, you could opt out all, some, or none of your European patent rights.

The Latest Thought Leadership pieces in the Content Hub

Unitary Patent as an object of property
November 9, 2022
A registered intellectual property right such as a patent is normally considered a property right of the country in which it has effect. Rules relating to the patent as an object of property, for...
What are the options if you want to avoid the UPC?
November 3, 2022
During the transitional period, it is possible to opt classical (i.e. non-unitary) European patents and applications out of the competence of the UPC (provided that no action has commenced at the UPC...
What are the options if you want to be able to use the UPC?
November 3, 2022
All unitary patents fall within the competence of the Unified Patent Court (UPC). Additionally, classical validations of European Patents in states which have ratified the UPC agreement are within...
How does the opt-out work?
November 1, 2022
The Unified Patent Court (UPC) will ultimately be responsible for all litigation in participating member states relating to patents granted by the European Patent Office (EPO); national courts in...
What is the Unified Patent Court?
November 1, 2022
The Unified Patent Court ("UPC") is a new pan-European court which opened for business on 1 June 2023. It adjudicates disputes relating to the new Unitary Patents and also to existing and future...
What is the Unitary Patent and how do I get one?
November 1, 2022
The Unitary Patent (UP) is a single patent right, obtained via the European Patent Office, covering all EU Member States which have ratified the agreement at the patent grant date, and is subject to...
Stay in the Know

The Patent Strategist

Get expert insights and the top patent stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Heading
This is some text inside of a div block.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Latest Insights

Showing 0 of 100
The contentious role of intellectual property in cryptographic standardisation
12 January 2026
This article explores how intellectual property rights affect the development and adoption of post-quantum cryptography standards. It highlights NIST’s proactive approach to patent licensing for new algorithms, reviews historical cases like RSA and ECC, and discusses the importance of clear IP terms for widespread cryptographic adoption.
#
Patenting
​
System architecture in quantum computing – history repeating itself?
24 December 2025
This article explores the evolution of system architecture in quantum computing, drawing parallels with the early days of classical computing. It discusses the current challenges in quantum hardware, the emergence of quantum instruction set architectures (ISAs), and the potential for a RISC vs. CISC debate similar to that in classical computing. The piece highlights opportunities for innovation and intellectual property, suggesting that the choices made now could shape the future landscape of quantum technologies and licensing.
#
Patenting
​
Strategic licensing: Turning IP into commercial value
09 December 2025
In today’s competitive landscape, effective commercial licensing strategies are essential for unlocking the full value of intellectual property. This article explores four critical pillars: understanding intellectual property as a property right, the fundamentals of licensing intellectual property rights, structuring successful joint ventures and best practices for intellectual property rights management. Whether you’re navigating new markets or scaling established innovations, these tips provide a roadmap for protecting, leveraging and maximizing your IP assets.
#
Consulting
​
The people, physics and patents of the 2025 Nobel prize
09 December 2025
The 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics recognised John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret, and John M. Martinis for proving macroscopic quantum tunnelling in electric circuits, a breakthrough that enabled quantum computing. Their pioneering research led to hundreds of patents, including innovations in MRI and quantum technology, highlighting the real-world impact of their discoveries.
#
Patenting
​
Vision 2035: The need for Innovation to meet ambitious targets set by the UK’s new critical minerals strategy
03 December 2025
The UK’s Critical Minerals Strategy 2025 sets ambitious targets to secure essential minerals for key industries by boosting domestic production, recycling, and innovation. The article highlights the vital role of intellectual property (IP) in supporting technological advances, encouraging collaboration, and strengthening the UK’s supply chains for a sustainable future.
#
Consulting
​
Research underlying Nobel prize in chemistry has sparked innovation and patent filings
02 December 2025
The 2025 Nobel Prize in Chemistry recognised the creators of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), innovative materials with huge potential for water harvesting, clean energy, and environmental solutions. Their work has sparked a surge in global patent activity and new industrial application.
#
Patenting
​
UKIPO fee increases from April 2026: What it means for your IP strategy
25 November 2025
Provisional and interim injunctions both refer to temporary court orders granted before a full trial, aimed at preserving the status quo or preventing harm. In UK law, “interim injunction” is the standard term, while “provisional injunction” is less common and typically used in international contexts. Both serve the same purpose: urgent relief until the case is fully heard.
#
Patenting
​
Sustainable models: content licensing for generative AI training
21 November 2025
It is fair to say that no technology in recent times has created so much excitement and controversy as generative AI, and in particular Large Language Models (LLMs). Generative AI companies and their backers have their sights on generating billions, if not trillions of dollars, directly or indirectly from their models. Models which, in the vast majority of cases, are trained on original works without permission from, or payment to, their authors. The works used for training are primarily obtained by scraping the open web, a uniquely vast repository of publicly accessible knowledge and information, constantly updated to reflect the latest developments in human knowledge and culture.
#
Consulting
​
What should you look to protect in a (bio)pharma IP strategy?
18 November 2025
#
Patenting
​
Trade Secrets: Navigating geopolitical risks and IP theft in the semiconductor industry
04 November 2025
Semiconductors have always been a critical technology but have grown significantly in strategic importance in recent years. They have become the key building block in developing and existing markets, including quantum computing, edge computing, AI, IoT, automotive, cellular data technology, smartphones, robotics, and many more. The complex designs and innovations that power semiconductor manufacturing are invaluable both to the world’s economy and technological advancement. Consequently, the semiconductor industry has found itself at the centre of geopolitical tensions, especially between the United States and China. It has become a prime target for cyberattacks and intellectual-property (IP) theft. As such, companies operating in this area must be more vigilant in protecting their intellectual assets.
#
Consulting
​
UPC takes strict approach on costs reimbursement
30 October 2025
Insulet v. EOFlow UPC_CFI_773/2025 and UPC_CFI 774/2025 (Milan CD), decision of 15 October 2025[1] The dispute began when Insulet sought a provisional injunction against EOFlow to prevent...
#
Litigation
​
UPC Considers but does not decide exhaustion of rights in relation to consumables
30 October 2025
Brita v. Aquashield UPC CFI 248/2024 (Munich LD), decision of 22 August 2025[1] UPC CFI 564/2024 (Munich LD), decision of 16 October 2025[2] Brita sued Aquashield and others for infringement of...
#
Litigation
​
Beyond Borders: A Backpacker’s Take on Why Your Patent Strategy Needs a Global Mindset
29 September 2025
In today’s interconnected world, innovation rarely stops at borders. Whether you’re a multinational corporation or a UK-based business with global ambitions, your patent strategy should reflect the reality that your products, services, and competitors operate internationally. Much like a well-travelled backpacker planning a round-the-world adventure, businesses must prepare carefully—mapping out routes, anticipating local rules, and packing what’s essential—to ensure a smooth journey.
#
Patenting
​
UPC Infringement Actions: Is Speed Meeting Expectations?
23 September 2025
The Unified Patent Court promised simplified and faster patent litigation across Europe. Two years in, we look at whether it’s delivering on that promise. For patent holders and defendants alike, the duration of infringement actions can significantly impact market strategies, investment decisions, and competitive positioning. In this article, we set out an in-depth analysis of how the court’s procedural rules are shaping the pace of litigation. By examining key milestones—from the filing of an infringement action to the issuance of a final judgment—we assess whether the UPC is delivering on its promise of efficiency.
#
Litigation
​
Emerging Practice Points from the UPC
02 September 2025
We have been keeping a close eye on the decisions coming out of the UPC and as the court starts to establish itself a number of practice points are starting to emerge.
#
Litigation
​