JIPLP: Can springboard injunctions be awarded in respect of non-infringing acts?

No items found.
02 March 2014
Tags
Litigation
Life

The Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice (JIPLP) has published an article by partner Darren Smyth and IP Solicitor Emma Muncey about the latest judgement in a series of disputes between Smith & Nephew and Convatec involving wound dressings.

The Patents Court found that (i) Smith & Nephew's process for preparing silverized wound dressings did not infringe Convatec's patent; (ii) several experiments from Smith & Nephew's earlier development work, which were used to obtain regulatory (CE) authorization, did infringe the patent; and (iii) while the court was capable of granting final springboard injunctions to restrain non-infringing acts, this case did not justify the grant of such relief.

To read the JIPLP article in full, click here.

Related articles

EIP recognsied for strategic leadership in patent law at the Professional Services Management Excellence Awards
26 March 2026
EIP has been recognised with two Professional Services Management Excellence Awards 2026, including Excellence in Strategic Leadership and Best in Theme: Leadership. The awards reflect the firm’s commitment to aligning patent expertise with commercial insight, strengthening leadership across the firm and delivering patent strategy that supports investment, growth and high‑value business decisions.
EIP promotes Callum Docherty to Principal in the US
19 March 2026
EIP is pleased to announce the promotion of Callum Docherty to Principal, recognizing his substantial contribution to the firm’s international patent practice and his leadership within EIP’s growing US team.
EIP announces the promotion of Rob Barker to Partner
12 March 2026
EIP is pleased to announce the promotion of Robert Barker to Partner, recognising his significant contribution to the firm’s Digital, Chemistry, Life Sciences, and multidisciplinary patent practice since joining in 2014.