Ask the Experts: Can I get a patent for my invention?

No items found.
​
August 17, 2021

In the first article in this series, we introduced patent attorneys, and suggested that ‘How do I get a patent’ may not be the first question to ask a patent attorney. In this article we look at three questions that you may wish to ask first.

Q: Can I get a patent for my invention?

A: Generally, patentable inventions relate to technical solutions to problems. In short, they relate to ‘how’ something works and not, for example, how it looks. The invention must be new and not obvious in light of what is publicly available information. A patent attorney will discuss with the inventor how their invention differs from existing solutions. Depending on the inventor’s knowledge of the field, it might be recommended that a search is carried out to see if someone has got there (or close enough) before you.

However, there are certain things that are not patentable – such as methods of doing business and some types of computer-implemented inventions. The UK patent office deals with many cases where the invention is new and not obvious but falls very close to the boundary between patentable and unpatentable subject matter. This boundary is constantly evolving and being refined by the courts as new technologies emerge, and a patent attorney will be able to advise on the current situation, based on recent cases.

Q: Should I apply for a patent?

A: Patents are potentially extremely valuable assets: for example, a single pharmaceutical patent may give you a legal monopoly for a drug for many years. For many SMEs, a large portion of their assets are in the form of intellectual property. However, depending on your business plan, it is also possible that the value of a patent may be less than the cost of obtaining it. Therefore, it is essential to take into account costs and risks as well as potential benefits: intellectual property rights should be treated in your business plan with just as much care as other assets, such as machinery, premises, and so on.

Something else to consider is whether the subject matter of your invention is actually made public by selling your product or service. For example, if your invention relates to a more efficient way of manufacturing an existing product, and you can keep that process secret, applying for a patent may not be appropriate.

Q: Is now the right time to apply?

A: Many time limits relating to both national and international processes are determined based on when you file the first application for a patent. For example, the expiry of a patent is determined based on the date of filing the application. In the UK, there is a time limit for getting the patent office to agree to grant the patent. Decisions on filing further applications to get coverage in other territories may have to be made relatively quickly after filing the first application.

The application will be made public 18 months after filing, so your competitors may learn of your technology even if you haven’t launched any product or service.

For these reasons, it may be better to keep the invention secret and wait before filing. A delay can also allow you to refine it further, to develop prototypes, or to ensure that the invention (and not some other feature) provides the benefits expected.

A real scenario recently concerned an applicant who had filed an application for their own invention. The patent office raised various objections to the application and concluded that the invention would not actually work, and therefore that no patent could be granted. Although developing a prototype in this case was difficult (the invention related to space travel), more research and consultation with a patent attorney may have avoided the time and expense of filing the application in the first place.

On the other hand, if your business plan includes a product or service launch on a particular date, then it is essential that you have filed an application for a patent before that date. To maximise the probability that you are able to obtain a valuable patent, work on your application should begin well in advance of this date.

In the next article in the series, we’ll look at some of the details around applying for a patent.

Written by David Hole

Why not download ‘The Ultimate Patent Guide for SMEs’ to understand more about how your business can successfully use patents to accelerate growth?

Our in-house experts at EIP work with businesses of all sizes to provide practical commercial advice. We are a specialist patent firm with practising offices in the US and Europe, and capable of coordinating the filing and prosecution of patent applications worldwide.

The information in this article is for guidance only and should not be taken as legal advice. If you run or work for an SME and need advice regarding patents, contact us today.

Click here for article one, article three and article four of the series.

The Latest Thought Leadership pieces in the Content Hub

No items found.
Stay in the Know

The Patent Strategist

Get expert insights and the top patent stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Heading
This is some text inside of a div block.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Latest Insights

Showing 0 of 100
Quantum IP Strategy: Own control Points, Not Patent Counts
14 October 2026
In quantum, the strongest portfolios will not be the biggest. Stuart Malcolm sets out six moves for owning the control points the market cannot route around, and the questions investors will ask.
#
Consulting
​
Targeted, Not Transformative: The UKIPO’s Considered Course on SEPs
13 October 2026
Andrew Sharples analyses the UKIPO's response to its SEP consultation, exploring proposed changes to FRAND dispute resolution, SEP transparency and licensing guidance, and what they mean for SEP holders and implementers.
#
Consulting
​
Chinese Companies in European Patent Litigation
30 September 2026
Chinese companies are becoming increasingly active in European patent litigation, both as defendants and as patent owners enforcing their own rights. This article examines the growing role of Europe and the Unified Patent Court (UPC) in global patent disputes, highlighting key cases involving Chinese businesses and the strategic opportunities and risks that come with operating in European markets. It is the first in a series exploring the practical implications of European patent enforcement for Chinese companies.
#
Patenting
​
How to mitigate prior art traps for follow-on pharma patents
27 August 2026
Follow-on patents are increasingly important for pharmaceutical innovators. Learn how new EMA clinical trial disclosure rules create prior art risks and discover practical strategies to protect pharmaceutical IP and maximise patent value.
#
Consulting
​
Chinese companies and the UPC: from enforcement targets to strategic users
13 August 2026
Chinese companies are playing an increasingly significant role in UPC litigation, accounting for around 38% of infringement actions in 2025. While many remain defendants, a growing number are actively using the Unified Patent Court to enforce their own patent rights across Europe. The trend highlights the UPC's rising importance for Chinese businesses operating in sectors such as telecommunications, semiconductors, medical devices and renewable energy, and signals a shift in global patent enforcement strategy.
#
Patenting
​
Evaluating the environmental impact of patent AI.
31 July 2026
AI's environmental impact is rarely out of the headlines, but how does it compare to the benefits it delivers in practice? In this article, Laurence Brown examines the energy use of AI-assisted patent drafting, comparing it with traditional drafting workflows. While measuring AI's true environmental footprint is far from straightforward, the analysis suggests that AI-assisted patent drafting may already be more energy efficient, while delivering significant productivity gains for patent professionals.
#
Patenting
​
UPC appeals after three years: Early indications on appeal success rates
15 July 2026
Three years into the UPC, appeal overturn rates sit at 56% for both substantive and preliminary injunction cases, with Kodak v Fujifilm among the rulings reshaping outcomes on appeal.
#
Litigation
​
The UPC After Three Years: From Experiment to Enforcement Forum
15 July 2026
1,282 cases filed at the UPC in three years: infringement actions have surged while revocation filings stayed flat, easing fears the Court would become a European patent graveyard.
#
Litigation
​
Podcast: Building an AI-Native Law Firm
26 June 2026
On the Technically Legal podcast, EIP partner Laurence Brown discusses how Visser AI is redesigning patent workflows, letting the firm offer fixed fees without trading away speed or quality.
#
Patenting
​
Choosing your SEP battleground: UPC, Germany or UK?
07 June 2026
Choosing the right venue for SEP litigation can significantly influence the outcome of FRAND disputes. This article compares the UPC, German and UK courts, examining their approaches to injunctions, FRAND defences, rate-setting and enforcement. It highlights the strategic advantages of each jurisdiction and explains why many SEP owners are increasingly turning to the UK and UPC as part of their European enforcement strategy.
#
Litigation
​
Synthetic Lethality & AI: IP Strategy in Oncology
26 May 2026
This article explores the resurgence of synthetic lethality in precision oncology, highlighting how AI and machine learning are accelerating the discovery of new therapeutic targets. It also examines growing clinical activity, investment, and the evolving intellectual property challenges shaping this emerging field.
#
Consulting
​
Inside the Visser AI Launch Party
20 May 2026
EIP has officially launched Visser AI®, our hybrid intelligence service for patent drafting and prosecution. Watch the launch film from our event at The Boundary in Shoreditch, and discover how our team of European and US patent attorneys — working with the Patently AI platform , delivers faster, lower-cost work at the EPO, USPTO and beyond.
#
Consulting
​
Protecting Your Startup: Five Intellectual Property Mistakes to Avoid
20 May 2026
Early‑stage startups often focus on product development and fundraising, but overlooking intellectual property (IP) can seriously damage long‑term value. This article explores five common IP mistakes startups make, with a particular focus on patents. It covers the risks of filing patents without professional advice, making public disclosures too early, failing to put enforceable contracts in place with third parties, misunderstanding what patent rights actually provide, and neglecting to develop a clear IP strategy. By highlighting these pitfalls and offering practical guidance, the article helps startups protect their innovations, strengthen their commercial position, and improve their prospects with investors.
#
Consulting
​
Technology, Patents, and Sport
13 May 2026
VAR, goal-line tech, AI 3D player avatars, wearable trackers, the technology reshaping the 2026 World Cup and elite sport rests on a patent system that makes the R&D investment behind it worth taking.
#
Patenting
​
Patents or Trade Secrets? When to Patent in Deep Tech Innovation
11 May 2026
Deep tech companies face unique IP challenges due to long development cycles, high upfront investment, and complex technologies that combine products and processes. This article explores when patents, trade secrets, or a combination of both offer the strongest protection. It explains how factors such as detectability, reverse engineering risk, disclosure to third parties, and employee mobility should shape IP strategy decisions. While patents are often best suited to externally visible or licensable technologies, trade secrets can be highly effective for internal processes and know‑how that deliver performance or cost advantages.
#
Patenting
​