The evolution of nucleic acid sequencing and what it means for Genomics and IP

​
April 27, 2026

The journey from deciphering individual DNA strands to sequencing entire genomes in hours represents one of biotechnology's most impressive transformations. The first human genome, completed through the Human Genome Project, took around 13 years to sequence and cost billions of dollars, whereas modern sequencing methods can now deliver a genome in hours for a few hundred dollars. For those interested in patents and life sciences, understanding the technical evolution of sequencing methods offers insights into how fundamental scientific advances translate into valuable patent portfolios.
‍

First Generation: Sanger

Developed in 1977, Sanger sequencing established the foundation for modern DNA sequencing. The technique relies on modified nucleotides called dideoxy nucleotides (ddNTPs) that, when incorporated during DNA synthesis, terminate the growing chain due to their lack of a 3'-OH group. By creating DNA fragments of varying lengths that can be separated and analysed, the Sanger method can be used to determine DNA sequences base by base.

Despite its ground breaking nature, Sanger sequencing is labour-intensive and costly. Its maximum read length is around 1,000 base pairs and throughput is limited by its sequential nature. Nevertheless, it remained the gold standard for over two decades and powered the completion of the Human Genome Project. Its high accuracy, at approximately99.9%, still makes it useful for validating short sequences and verifying genetic variants in clinical settings today.

Second Generation: The NGS Revolution

The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the mid-2000s transformed genomics by enabling massively parallel sequencing, processing millions of DNA fragments simultaneously, rather than one at a time. This shift reduced sequencing costs by orders of magnitude and improved access to genomic analysis.

Illumina Sequencing-by-Synthesis

Illumina's platform dominates the NGS market through its sequencing-by-synthesis (SBS) approach. Genomic DNA is first fragmented, ligated to adaptors and loaded onto a flow cell, where each fragment is immobilised and clonally amplified into a cluster by bridge amplification. During sequencing, fluorescently labelled nucleotides are added sequentially in cycles. Each nucleotide incorporation produces a distinct fluorescent signal captured by optical detectors. This results in millions of short reads that are computationally aligned (e.g. to a reference genome) to reconstruct the original longer sequence.

Illumina systems deliver high accuracy, with fragment read lengths typically between 50-300 base pairs. Their scalability ranges from benchtop instruments for small laboratories to production-scale sequencers generating terabases of data per run. This combination of accuracy, throughput, and declining costs has positioned Illumina as the current market leader in this space.

Ion Torrent: Semiconductor Sequencing

Ion Torrent technology, owned by Thermo Fisher, eliminated the optical detection systems used by Illumina. Instead, it detects hydrogen ions (H+) released during nucleotide incorporation. When a nucleotide binds to a growing DNA strand, it releases a hydrogen ion, causing a pH change detected by ion-sensitive field-effect transistors (ISFETs) embedded in a semiconductor chip.

DNA fragments are clonally amplified on beads via emulsion PCR (PCR in water-in-oil droplets to compartmentalise individual templates with beads), then loaded into microwells on a semiconductor chip and exposed to sequential nucleotide flow cycles,similar to SBS. Base incorporation is detected electronically by measuring pH changes and converting these signals directly into sequence data, enabling fast runs (as short as a few hours) and lower instrument costs by avoiding complex optics. However, accuracy can suffer in homopolymer regions (stretches of identical bases), where multiple incorporations in a single cycle make ion-based quantification harder, leading to slightly higher error rates. That said, the speed and cost benefits make Ion Torrent attractive for applications such as microbial genomics.

DNBSEQ: DNA Nanoball Technology

Another short‑read platform worth a mention is the MGI (a subsidiary of the BGI Group) DNBSEQ platform, which represents a distinct second‑generation approach using DNA nanoballs (DNBs). DNA fragments are circularised, amplified by rolling‑circle amplification into compact nanoballs, and loaded onto patterned nanoarrays. Sequencing is then performed using combinatorial probe-anchor synthesis (cPAS),an SBS‑like cyclic chemistry in which fluorescently labelled nucleotides are incorporated and the array is imaged each cycle to determine the sequence.

DNBSEQ technology is reported to achieve accuracy comparable to Illumina platforms while offering a user-friendly platform with competitive pricing, which could contribute to increased adoption in China and other Asian markets.

Third generation: long-read, single molecule sequencing

While second-generation methods revolutionised throughput and cost, their short-read lengths create challenges for assembling complete genomes from fragments. Third-generation technologies address these limitations by sequencing single DNA molecules in real time,producing reads measuring thousands to even millions of bases. These approaches have also opened the door to direct RNA sequencing.

Oxford Nanopore Sequencing

Oxford Nanopore Technologies(ONT) pioneered a unique approach: passing DNA or RNA strands through protein channels (nanopores) embedded in a synthetic membrane. An electrical current flows through the pore, and as nucleotides of the strand pass through, they cause characteristic disruptions in this current. Sophisticated algorithms decode these current fluctuations into sequence information.

Nanopore sequencing runs can be analysed as data are generated and read lengths can span from short fragments to multi‑mega base lengths. Notably, the technology can also be used to call certain base modifications (including methylation) and can directly sequence RNA strands. These properties can be leveraged where rapid, on‑site sequencing is useful, such as pathogen identification or field sampling.

Recent chemistry improvements and advanced base calling algorithms have further improved accuracy, making this exciting technology increasingly competitive for diverse genomic analyses.

Pacific Biosciences SMRT Sequencing

Single Molecule Real-Time (SMRT)sequencing, developed by Pacific Biosciences (PacBio), monitors individual DNA polymerase enzymes as they synthesise DNA in real time. The technology uses zero-mode wave guides (ZMWs), which are tiny observation chambers where a single polymerase molecule is attached to a DNA template. As the polymerase incorporates fluorescently labelled nucleotides, brief fluorescent pulses are detected and decoded into sequence information.

SMRT sequencing can generate long reads, and in circular consensus sequencing (CCS) mode the same circular template is read multiple times and combined into a high‑accuracy consensus (HiFi) read. Analysis software also supports epigenetic research by measuring the rate of DNA base incorporation during sequencing. The long reads of SMRT sequencing can be useful for de novo genome assembly and for detection of structural variants and repetitive regions.

Emerging technology: the fourth generation

Roche Sequencing by Expansion(SBX)

Roche has introduced a new approach called sequencing by expansion (SBX), designed to further enhance signal‑to‑noise performance in nanopore‑based sequencing. SBX first uses a biochemical conversion step to encode the sequence of a target nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) into a longer, engineered surrogate polymer (an “Xpandomer”) built from expandable nucleotide triphosphates (X‑NTPs). The resulting expanded molecule is then read using Roche’s nanopore sensing system, with the goal of enabling faster, high‑accuracy single‑molecule sequencing across a range of read lengths. It will be interesting to see whether SBX achieves broad uptake and becomes a widely adopted platform.

Patent landscape and IP strategy

The nucleic acid sequencing field exemplifies both the value of fundamental biotech platform patents and the emerging importance of algorithmic innovations in competitive strategy.

Platform Patents Remain Crucial

Foundational patents covering sequencing chemistries, hardware architectures, and new biochemical processes continue to command significant market power and generate substantial licensing revenue or settlement payments. The July 2022 settlement between Illumina and BGI (including Complete Genomics) illustrates this, where Illumina reportedly agreed to pay $325 million to resolve patent infringement claims and terminate multiple pending lawsuits.

Despite sequencing becoming more commoditised, core platform technologies remain fiercely protected and highly valuable. The sequencing industry has a long track record of patent and competition disputes, and multiple legal proceedings between major players and newer entrants remain ongoing across jurisdictions, continuing to influence commercial strategy and market dynamics.

Algorithmic innovation

Sequencing advances increasing lyhinge on computation and machine learning, particularly for improved error correction and base/variant calling. This raises IP issues distinct from, and sometimes intersecting with, biochemical inventions. For instance, software and algorithm focussed claims can face tougher eligibility scrutiny and should be directed to concrete technical improvements (e.g., higher accuracy, lower compute, or new processing architectures), not abstract mathematics implemented on a computer.

For sequencing algorithms, companies must weigh patents against trade secrets or find ways of utilising both. Patents can block competitors but require full disclosure; where methods can be hard to reverse-engineer from outputs (as with many “black box” base callers), trade secrets may preserve advantage longer than a 20‑year patent term while avoiding disclosure that enables design‑around.

Balancing protection strategies

The most sophisticated IP strategies in sequencing combine multiple protection mechanisms, including platform patents for core hardware and chemistry, a mix of patents and trade secrets for algorithmic improvements, and copyright protection for software implementations. Companies must also consider that maintaining trade secrets requires robust confidentiality measures and does not provide any protection against independent third-party innovation, while patents demand ongoing prosecution costs and eventual public disclosure.

For both startups and established companies, navigating this complex landscape requires careful assessment of each innovation's characteristics, competitive dynamics, reverse-engineering risk, and long-term business strategy. The substantial settlements and ongoing litigation demonstrate that getting IP strategy right can determine market position and company valuation in this competitive sector.

‍

The Latest Thought Leadership pieces in the Content Hub

No items found.
Stay in the Know

The Patent Strategist

Get expert insights and the top patent stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Heading
This is some text inside of a div block.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Latest Insights

Showing 0 of 100
Is Your AI Conversation Privileged?
08 May 2026
Recent US court decisions have, for the first time, tested whether conversations with AI tools can be protected by legal privilege. In United States v. Heppner, a court held that documents generated by a defendant using a public AI platform were not protected by attorney‑client privilege, largely because the AI was not used within a lawyer‑directed relationship and the platform’s terms allowed data retention and disclosure. By contrast, in Warner v. Gilbarco, another court found that AI‑assisted materials created by a self‑represented litigant were protected under the work‑product doctrine, which has a more forgiving standard for waiver.
#
Consulting
​
The evolution of nucleic acid sequencing and what it means for Genomics and IP
27 April 2026
This article outlines the evolution of nucleic acid sequencing, from early Sanger methods to next‑generation and long‑read technologies. The journey from deciphering individual DNA strands to sequencing entire genomes in hours represents one of biotechnology's most impressive transformations. The first human genome, completed through the Human Genome Project, took around 13 years to sequence and cost billions of dollars, whereas modern sequencing methods can now deliver a genome in hours for a few hundred dollars. For those interested in patents and life sciences, understanding the technical evolution of sequencing methods offers insights into how fundamental scientific advances translate into valuable patent portfolios.
#
Consulting
​
World IP Day: The big ideas shaping IP's fastest-moving fields
24 April 2026
For World IP Day, we asked experts of EIP’s five growth areas: Uniphy, Ampliphy, Stratiphy, Codiphy and Quantiphy, to share a quick insight on innovation, IP trends, and what excites them about the future. Each responded to a single, focused question reflecting the role their team plays across EIP.
#
Consulting
​
Meet the EIP team heading to INTA 2026 in London
23 April 2026
INTA's Annual Meeting is coming to London. From 2–6 May 2026, the ExCeL will host more than 10,000 trade mark and IP professionals from over 100 jurisdictions — five days of sessions, side events, and the kind of corridor conversations that turn into lasting working relationships.
#
Litigation
​
Antibody Patent Protection in Europe and the US: Navigating EPO and USPTO Differences
16 April 2026
This article explores the complexities of patenting antibody therapies, focusing on the differing requirements and practices of the European Patent Office (EPO) and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). It highlights how the scope of claims, inventiveness standards, and supporting data requirements vary between jurisdictions, and explains why a tailored IP strategy is essential for innovators especially SMEs seeking protection in both Europe and the US. The article also outlines how EIP’s transatlantic teams collaborate to optimise patent applications for success in these key markets.
#
Patenting
​
Why competitor patent monitoring is critical to your drug development strategy
15 April 2026
This article explains why competitor IP monitoring is a critical part of an effective drug development strategy. By tracking competitor patent activity, companies can assess freedom to operate, identify risks and opportunities early, and make informed decisions on patent filings, licensing, and investment readiness. Ongoing monitoring also supports FTO analysis, third‑party observations, oppositions, and litigation strategy, helping life sciences businesses protect value and reduce risk throughout development.
#
Consulting
​
Biopharma Strategy in 2026: Lessons from 2025 on AI, M&A and the UPC
13 April 2026
This article looks back on a selection of key trends in the (bio)pharma industry in 2025 and looks ahead to how these may continue to develop into 2026.
#
Consulting
​
Thinking about IP from day one: strategic considerations for deep tech startups
08 April 2026
For deep tech startups, intellectual property decisions often come too late or cost too much too soon. This article explores why IP strategy should be considered from day one, even if formal protection comes later. It outlines how founders can decide what to patent, when trade secrets may be more appropriate, and how detectability, enforceability and cost should shape early choices. With a focus on practicality and commercial alignment, it also looks at how newer, AI‑assisted approaches can help startups take a more cost‑effective and flexible approach to building meaningful IP protection.
#
Consulting
​
National offices report increases in national patent applications throughout Europe: Is the EPO no longer “killing” the national offices?
27 March 2026
National patent offices across Europe have reported a marked increase in patent filings in 2025, breaking with a long‑standing downward trend. Data from Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, Austria, Spain and Norway point to growing activity driven by digital technologies, electrification and increased university participation. At the same time, offices report a rise in self‑drafted and AI‑assisted applications, which may lower barriers to entry but also raise concerns about application quality and examination efficiency.
#
Patenting
​
Make your bio(pharma) IP investment ready
22 March 2026
This recap of our LinkedIn Live series focuses on helping (bio)pharma businesses make their IP investment‑ready. Across three sessions, experts will discuss building resilient IP portfolios, making strategic IP decisions ahead of funding rounds, and what the evolving 2026 (bio)pharma landscape means for long‑term IP strategy.
#
Patenting
​
Are professional guidelines making Patent Attorneys too cautious on AI?
19 February 2026
As AI use accelerates in patent practice, many European patent attorneys remain cautious due to professional AI guidelines from the epi. This article argues those guidelines are not a barrier, but a baseline for responsible use.
#
Patenting
​
Provisional Agreement Reached on the EU Pharma Package: Takeaways for Pharmaceutical Companies
17 February 2026
The EU’s new Pharma Package will overhaul regulatory exclusivity, orphan drug incentives, antimicrobial innovation, and generic entry pathways, reducing standard protection periods while introducing new rewards like transferable exclusivity vouchers.
#
Patenting
​
Beyond CRISPR: Precision to Platform
23 January 2026
Gene editing is entering a new phase, moving beyond CRISPR-Cas9’s breakthrough but costly, bespoke therapies toward more precise and scalable platforms. While CRISPR-based treatments like Casgevy have proven clinical success, they remain expensive and entangled in ongoing patent disputes over foundational IP. Next-generation tools such as base editing and prime editing avoid double-strand DNA breaks, enabling more accurate corrections and broader therapeutic potential. The field’s focus is now shifting to disease-agnostic platforms that can be adapted across many conditions, improving access and efficiency.
#
Patenting
​
Confidentiality at the UPC: What litigants need to know
21 January 2026
This article explains how the Unified Patent Court approaches confidentiality in litigation, outlining the procedures for restricting access to sensitive information, how confidentiality clubs are formed, and when hearings may be held in private. It highlights key case law shaping these rules, the balance between fair trial rights and protection of commercial data, and the penalties for breaches. Practical guidance is provided to help parties navigate applications, manage confidential documents, and understand what to expect throughout UPC proceedings.
#
Litigation
​
EPO fees are going up in April 2026: Plan ahead now
19 January 2026
The European Patent Office will introduce a fee increase of roughly 5% from 1 April 2026, affecting search, examination, designation and renewal fees. Filing, excess page, opposition and appeal fees remain unchanged. Some costs—such as renewal fees—can be paid up to three months early, allowing applicants to secure the current lower rates. EIP recommends reviewing your portfolio ahead of the deadline.
#
Patenting
​